Author: wagoal_wp

  • GOAL POST 2015-5: Legislative Update – 06 February 2015

    GOAL POST 2015-5: Legislative Update – 06 February 2015

    GOAL Post

    2015-5

    Legislative Update from Olympia

    06 February 2015

    NEW BILLS FILED

    MISSED A COUPLE LAST WEEK!

    TOY GUN CONTROL

    “SAFE STORAGE” BILLS BACK

    BILLS MOVE

    PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED

    TWO WEEKS UNTIL FIRST POLICY CHAMBER CUT-OFF

    FORMAT CHANGE:  MERGING “BILL STATUS” WITH “GOAL POSITION”

    Only two new gun bills have been filed this week.  SB 5789, by Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-36) is the Senate counterpart to HB 1747, the “this does not mandate how a firearm is stored” bill.  SB 5831, by Sen. Jim Honeyford (R-15) makes minor changes to the procedure to have firearm rights restored after certain misdemeanor convictions.

    While on the road earlier, I missed a few bills that should have been listed last week:  HB 1442 by Rep. Graham Hunt (R-2) promotes expansion of firearms/accessories and ammunition  manufacturing in Washington;  HB’s 1594 and 1692 by Rep. Sharon Wylie (D-49) would ban the manufacture, sale or possession of realistic-looking toy guns unless they are made of or coated with some bright color to indicate their non-gun status; HB 1731 by Rep. Timm Ormsby (D-3) is the House counterpart to SB 5381, mandates a waiting period before a firearm held by law enforcement may be returned to the legal owner and that any complainant be informed that the firearm is being returned.

    Toy guns in the crosshairs!  Not content to go after real guns, Rep. Sharon Wylie (D-49) has set her sights on toy guns as well.  She has filed HBs 1594 and 1692, both of which require all imitation (toy) guns sold or possessed in Washington to be made of some bright material or coloring to distinguish them from “real” firearms.  I guess Rep. Wylie isn’t familiar with the real pastel pistols offered these days by some manufacturers.

    For the 11th time in the past 18 years, bills penalizing gun owners if they fail to lock up their gun(s) and it/they are accessed by a juvenile have been filed.  HB 1747 (Kagi, D-32) and SB 5789 (Kohl-Welles, D-36) are the bills in question.  There are two significant differences in these versions of the bill from previous versions:  they raise the age limit of unauthorized access from sixteen to eighteen, and they cover ALL firearms where previous versions only addressed LOADED firearms.  The previous versions failed in several Democrat-controlled legislatures… these should die as well, but you can expect they will receive wide media attention.

    The bills contain a clear statement that “Nothing in this section mandates how or where a firearm must be stored.”  True statement, as far as it goes, but misleading.  If you DON’T lock up your gun(s), and a minor accesses it/them, YOU can be charged with a crime.  That’s the bottom line.  And while many legislators don’t believe or choose not to understand it, one size of gun security does not fit all.  Everyone’s circumstances vary, family configuration, maturity of children, security situation, etc.  It’s not up to someone sitting in the comfort of the legislative chamber to decide for you what works for you.

    The existing reckless endangerment statute (RCW 9a.36.050) already criminalizes a person who unnecessarily endangers another person with ANYTHING.  A charge of reckless endangerment was deferred in the 2012 Kitsap school shooting.  Maybe they should run a bill requiring prosecutors to do their jobs.  But what the bill’s proponents want is a GUN BILL, that demonizes GUNS, ignoring the fact that unintentional gunshot injuries are far down the list of dangers to children (and others).  This isn’t about safety, it’s about politics.

    (The next time a gun control proponents talks about “reasonable, common sense gun SAFETY” legislation, ask to see his or her firearms safety instructor certification, or even a gun safety course completion certificate.  They won’t have one.)

    Several hearings have been held on bills in the past two weeks.  Executive action (a vote) has been taken on a few, others await a vote.  Hint: a committee chair can sit on a bill and not hold a vote… ever, if he or she doesn’t want to move the bill  HB 1131 (ivory sale/transfer) was passed in amended form and sent to the House General Government committee for further review.  SB5036 (use of body armor in a crime) passed out of Senate Law & Justice and now sits in Senate Rules, awaiting a pull to the Senate floor for a full Senate vote.

    At this point seven bills are scheduled for public hearing this coming week.  Senate Law & Justice will take public testimony on five bills on Monday, 9 February, at 1:30 p.m.  The bills are SBs 5831 (return of firearms held by law enforcement), 5476  and 5539 (both exempt active law enforcement officers from the three-day waiting period on handgun delivery — just like that enjoyed by CPL holders today), 5579 (exempts security guards from the I-594 background check requirement) and 5615 (exempts active military personnel from I-594).  HB 1731 (House version of SB 5831 — return of guns held by law enforcement) will be heard in House Judiciary on 10 February at 10:00 a.m. and HB 1857 (allows confiscation of firearms) in House Judiciary on 11 February 8 a.m.

    (If you can’t make it to a public hearing but want to submit comments on a given bill, you can do so via the legislative web site, on the specific page for each bill.  Go to http://app.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/, place the bill number in the box and click on “search.”:  When  the page appears for that specific bill, click on the green box labeled “Comment on this bill.”  Keep it polite, make a point or two, and cut it off.  This isn’t the place to vent — you do that on election day!)

    The first major cut-off comes in two weeks.  There are two weeks remaining before bills that have not received a public hearing and committee vote will die.  Given the number of bills yet to receive hearings and the limited time left, it’s clear that the majority of bill will die — technically, at least — on 20 February.  You may see a few evening hearings scheduled as committee chairs try to cram bills in, but historically half or more of bills filed fail to clear to clear the first hurdle.

    At the request of several subscribers, I have changed the GOAL Post format slightly.  Basically, I have merged the “Bill Status” and “GOAL Position” elements into a single section.  You can read the basics about the bill (number, subject, sponsor, status” and on the next line, the GOAL position on the bill.  I’ve tried putting all of it on the same line, but I run out of space.

    I’ve also been asked to prioritize bills, in support of or opposition to.  I can’t do that for several thousand subscribers.  Each of you has differing priorities, differing interests.  You have to choose what’s important to you.  If a particular bill needs special attention, I’ll do that in the narrative above.,

     

    BILL STATUS:

    Bill #  Subject  Prime sponsor Status
    HB 1119
    SUPPORT
    Hunter education issues Blake (D-17) H. Ag/NatRes
    *SHB 1131
    OPPOSE
    Prohibits sale/transfer of ivory Pettigrew (D-37) H. Ag/NatRes
    HB 1191
    SUPPORT
    CPL renewal notices Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.
    HB 1193
    SUPPORT
    Prohibiting gun owner data base Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.
    HB 1245
    SUPPORT
    Repeals I-594 Shea (R-4) H. Jud.
    HB 1324
    SUPPORT
    Codifies castle doctrine and stand your ground  Shea (R-4) Shea (R-4) H. Jud.
    HB 1433
    SUPPORT
    Modifies Gun Free School Zone law Scott (R-38) H. Jud.
    HB 1442
    SUPPORT
    Exp. economic development via firearms/ammo G. Hunt (R-2) H. Jud.
    HB 1474
    SUPPORT
    Defense against animal attack Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.
    HB 1506
    SUPPORT
    Exempts security guard transfers from I-594 Kirby (D-29) H. Jud.
    HB 1521
    SUPPORT
    Returns NICS “delay” to three days (I-594) Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.
    HB 1533
    SUPPORT
    Exempts guns loaned to museums from I-594 Van Werven (R-42) H. Jud.
    HB 1535
    SUPPORT
    Exempts active LEOs from waiting period Klippert (R-8) H. Jud.
    HB 1594
    OPPOSE
    Imitation firearms Wylie (D-49)  H. Jud.
    HB 1692
    OPPOSE
    Imitation firearms Wylie (D-49)  H. Jud.
    HB 1713
    OPPOSE
    Mental health/guns Cody (D-34) H. Jud.
    HB 1722
    SUPPORT
    Short barreled rifles Hayes (R-10) H. Jud.
    HB 1731
    OPPOSE
    Return of firearms held by law enforcement Ormsby (D-3) H. Jud.
    HB 1747
    OPPOSE
    Safe storage of firearms Kagi (D-32) H. Jud.
    HB 1857
    OPPOSE
    Extreme protective orders Jinkins (D-27)  H. Jud.
    HB 1886
    SUPPORT
    Repeals I-594 by popular vote Hunt (R-2) H. Jud.
    SB 5036
    NEUTRAL
    Penalizes criminal misuse of body armor O’Ban (R-28) S. L&J
    SB 5241
    OPPOSE
    Prohibits sale/transfer of ivory Litzow (R-41) S. NatRes/Parks
    SB 5381
    OPPOSE
    Return of firearms held by law enforcement Billig (D-3) S. L&J
    SB 5476
    SUPPORT
    Exempts active LEOs from waiting period Dammeier (R-25) S. L&J
    SB 5500
    SUPPORT
    Allows retired LEOs to carry on school grounds Roach (R-31) S. L&J
    SB 5539
    SUPPORT
    Exempts LEO’s from three day waiting period Roach (R-31) S. L&J
    SB 5579
    SUPPORT
    Exempts licensed security guards from b/g checks Dammeier (R-25) S. L&J
    SB 5615
    SUPPORT
    Exempts military members from b/g checks Benton (R-17) S. L&J
    SB 5643
    OPPOSE
    Mental health/guns O’Ban (R-28) S. HumSer
    SB 5658
    NEUTRAL
    Reporting of mental health commitment Dansel (R-7) S. L&J
    SB 5727
    OPPOSE
    Extreme protective orders Frockt (D-46) S. L&J
    SB 5789
    OPPOSE
    Safe storage of firearms Kohl-Welles (D-36) S. L&J
    SB 5831
    PENDING
    Restoration of firearm rights Honeyford (R-15) S. L&J

    HB = House Bill, SB = Senate Bill, H. Jud. = House Judiciary, S. L&J = Senate Law & Justice, H. Ag/NatRes = House Agriculture & Natural Resources, S. NatRes/Parks = Senate Natural Resources & Parks, S. Hum Ser = Senate Human Services, Mental Health & Housing

    * indicates change in status this week

    SHB/SSB = Substitute Bill (bill amended in committee), HB = House Bill, SB = Senate Bill, H. Jud. = House Judiciary, S. L&J = Senate Law & Justice, H. Ag/NatRes = House Agriculture & Natural Resources, S. NatRes/Parks = Senate Natural Resources & Parks, S. Hum Ser = Senate Human Services, Mental Health & Housing, H. GenGov = House General Government & Info Technology

    HEARINGS SCHEDULED:

    SBs 5381, 5476, 5539, 5579 and 5615
    9 Feb  1:30 p.m.
      Senate Law & Justice SHR “`1,” John A. Cherberg Bldg
    HB 1731
    10 Feb 10:00 a.m
     House Judiciary   HHR “A” John L. Obrien Building
    HB 1857
    11 Feb   8:00 a.m.
     House Judiciary   HHR “A” John L. O’Brien Building

     

    LEGISLATIVE HOT LINE:  You may reach your Representatives and Senator by calling the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000.  Toll free!!!  The hearing impaired may obtain TDD access at 1-800-635-9993.  Also toll free!!!

    1-800-562-6000          TDD 1-800-635-9993

    OTHER DATA:  Copies of pending legislation (bills), legislative schedules and other information are available on the legislature’s web site at “www.leg.wa.gov“.  Bills are available in Acrobat (.pdf) format.  You may download a free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe’s web site (http://www.adobe.com).  You may also obtain hard copy bills, initiatives, etc, in the mail from the Legislative Bill Room FREE OF CHARGE by calling 1-360-786-7573.  Copies of bills may also be ordered toll free by calling the Legislative Hotline at (800) 562-6000.  You may also hear floor and committee hearing action live at http://www.tvw.org/ (you need “RealAudio” to do this, available free at the TVW web site).

    By reading the House and Senate “bill reports” (hbr, sbr) for each bill, you can see how individual committee members voted.  By reading the “roll call” for each bill, you can see how the entire House or Senate voted on any bill.  The beauty of the web site is that ALL this information is available, on line, to any citizen.

    GET THE WORD OUT:  If you want to subscribe to the GOAL Post by e-mail, send a message to “[email protected]“.  Please pass GOAL Post on to anyone you believe may have an interest in protecting our rights.  Better yet, make a couple of copies of this message, post it on your gun club’s bulletin board, and leave copies with your local gun shop(s).  PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO DUPLICATE OR REDISTRIBUTE GOAL POST PROVIDED IT IS REPRODUCED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT TEXTUAL MODIFICATION AND CREDIT IS GIVEN TO GOAL.  I can be reached at “[email protected]” or by telephone at (425) 985-4867.  Unfortunately, I am unable to mail hard copy GOAL Post to individuals.  Limited numbers of hard copies MAY be available at the Second Amendment Foundation book table at WAC gun shows.

    If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail me at [email protected] with the words “Unsubscribe GOAL Post” in the subject line.  I will remove your name immediately.  Keep in mind GOAL Post is also published on several gun lists.  If you received GP via a list, you must contact that list’s admin to unsubscribe.

    Upcoming WAC gun show(s):

    Monroe           14-15 February

    Puyallup         21-22 February

    “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.”

    Article 1, Section 24

    Constitution of the State of Washington

    Copyright 2015 Gun Owners Action League of WA

     

    Posted by: GOAL <[email protected]>

    Fight I-594  Donate now at: www.wagunrights.org

  • GOAL Post 2015-4: Legislative Update from Olympia 30 January 2015

    GOAL Post

    2015-4

    Legislative Update from Olympia

    30 January 2015

    (Late distribution due to the fact I was attending the annual meeting of the Florida Sport Shooting Association at the Manatee Gun Club in Myakka City, FL.  Hopefully back on schedule this coming Friday.)

    EIGHT MORE GUN BILLS FILED

    MORE PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED

    37 INITIATIVES FILED — NO GUNS

    Eight new gun bills were filed this past week.  HB 1713 (Cody, D-34) would allow the courts to take guns from those determined to be at high risk, a much lower standard than currently exists.  HB 1722 (Hayes, R-10) clarifies short-barreled rifle provisions.  HB 1747 (Kagi, D-32) is attempt #11 since 1997 to pass a bill that allegedly does not mandate “lock up your guns,” but criminalizes you if you don’t and a child gains access.  This version is broader that previous versions which only applied to LOADED firearms; this one includes ALL firearms.  HB 1857 (Jinkins, D-27) allows family members and others to petition a court to confiscate firearms from those deemed an “extreme risk.”  HB 1886 (Hunt, R-2) would repeal I-594 in its entirety IF passed by a popular referendum.

    SB 5643 (O’Ban, R-28) allows seizure of firearms from those deemed at risk because of mental health issues; again, this lowers the standard for disarmament.  SB 5658 (Dansel, R-6) clarifies reporting requirements regarding commitment of individuals for mental health.  SB 5727 (Frockt, D-46) is the Senate version of HB 1857.

    28 firearm or firearm-related bills filed so far, and we’re only three weeks — 21 days — into the session!

    Public hearings were conducted this past week on HB 1131 (possession of ivory), SB 5241 (possession of ivory) and SB 5500 (retired LEO carry on school campus).  Links to the TVWashington video coverage of these bills may be found at the bottom of each bill page.  A green-boxed link at the top of each page allows readers to submit comments on a bill.

    Only two public hearings are scheduled for this week:  HB 1713 in House Judiciary on 3 Fenbruary and SB 5658 in Senate Law & Justice on 5 February.  Details below.

    To date, 37 initiatives have been filed with the Secretary of State, all Initiatives to the People.  At this point, NONE deal with firearms.  Most are tax-related or deal with marijuana.

    BILL STATUS:

    Bill #  Subject  Prime sponsor Status Goal Position
    HB 1119 Hunter education issues Blake (D-17) H. Ag/NatRes   SUPPORT
    HB 1131 Prohibits sale/transfer of ivory Pettigrew (D-37) H. Ag/NatRes   OPPOSE
    HB 1191 CPL renewal notices Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1193 Prohibiting gun owner data base Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1245 Repeals I-594 Shea (R-4) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1324 Codifies castle doctrine and stand your ground  Shea (R-4) Shea (R-4) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1433 Modifies Gun Free School Zone law Scott (R-38) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1474 Defense against animal attack Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1506 Exempts security guard transfers from I-594 Kirby (D-29) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1521 Returns NICS “delay” to three days (I-594) Taylor (R-15) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1533 Exempts guns loaned to museums from I-594 Van Werven (R-42) H. Jud.   SUPPORT
    HB 1535 Exempts active LEOs from waiting period Klippert (R-8) H. Jud.   OPPOSE
    HB 1713 Mental health/guns Cody (D-34) H. Jud. OPPOSE
    HB 1722 Short barreled rifles Hayes (R-10) H. Jud. SUPPORT
    HB 1747 Safe storage of firearms Kagi (D-32) H. Jud. OPPOSE
    HB 1857 Extreme protective orders Jinkins (D-27)  H. Jud.   OPPOSE
    HB 1886 Repeals I-594 by popular vote Hunt (R-2) H. Jud. SUPPORT
    SB 5036 Penalizes criminal misuse of body armor O’Ban (R-28) S. L&J PENDING
    SB 5241 Prohibits sale/transfer of ivory Litzow (R-41) S. NatRes/Parks OPPOSE
    SB 5381 Return of firearms held by law enforcement Billig (D-3) S. L&J OPPOSE
    SB 5476 Exempts active LEOs from waiting period Dammeier (R-25) S. L&J SUPPORT
    SB 5500 Allows retired LEOs to carry on school grounds Roach (R-31) S. L&J SUPPORT
    SB 5539 Exempts LEO’s from three day waiting period Roach (R-31) S. L&J SUPPORT
    SB 5579 Exempts licensed scty guards from b/g checks Dammeier (R-25) S. L&J SUPPORT
    SB 5615 Exempts military members from b/g checks Benton (R-17) S. L&J SUPPORT
    SB 5643 Mental health/guns O’Ban (R-28) S. HumSer OPPOSE
    SB 5658 Reporting of mental health commitment Dansel (R-7) S. L&J NEUTRAL
    SB 5727 Extreme protective orders Frockt (D-46) S. L&J OPPOSE

    HB = House Bill, SB = Senate Bill, H. Jud. = House Judiciary, S. L&J = Senate Law & Justice, H. Ag/NatRes = House Agriculture & Natural Resources, S. NatRes/Parks = Senate Natural Resources & Parks, S. Hum Ser = Senate Human Services, Mental Health & Housing

    HEARINGS SCHEDULED:

    HB 1713   House Judiciary  HHR “A”  John L. O’Brien Building
    3 Feb  10:00 a.m.
    SB 5658 Senate Law & Justice SHR “1”  John A. Cherberg Building
    5 Feb  8:00 a.m.

    LEGISLATIVE HOT LINE:  You may reach your Representatives and Senator by calling the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000.  Toll free!!!  The hearing impaired may obtain TDD access at 1-800-635-9993.  Also toll free!!!

    1-800-562-6000          TDD 1-800-635-9993

    OTHER DATA:  Copies of pending legislation (bills), legislative schedules and other information are available on the legislature’s web site at “www.leg.wa.gov“.  Bills are available in Acrobat (.pdf) format.  You may download a free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe’s web site (http://www.adobe.com).  You may also obtain hard copy bills, initiatives, etc, in the mail from the Legislative Bill Room FREE OF CHARGE by calling 1-360-786-7573.  Copies of bills may also be ordered toll free by calling the Legislative Hotline at (800) 562-6000.  You may also hear floor and committee hearing action live at http://www.tvw.org/ (you need “RealAudio” to do this, available free at the TVW web site).

    By reading the House and Senate “bill reports” (hbr, sbr) for each bill, you can see how individual committee members voted.  By reading the “roll call” for each bill, you can see how the entire House or Senate voted on any bill.  The beauty of the web site is that ALL this information is available, on line, to any citizen.

    GET THE WORD OUT:  If you want to subscribe to the GOAL Post by e-mail, send a message to “[email protected]“.  Please pass GOAL Post on to anyone you believe may have an interest in protecting our rights.  Better yet, make a couple of copies of this message, post it on your gun club’s bulletin board, and leave copies with your local gun shop(s).  PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO DUPLICATE OR REDISTRIBUTE GOAL POST PROVIDED IT IS REPRODUCED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT TEXTUAL MODIFICATION AND CREDIT IS GIVEN TO GOAL.  I can be reached at “[email protected]” or by telephone at (425) 985-4867.  Unfortunately, I am unable to mail hard copy GOAL Post to individuals.  Limited numbers of hard copies MAY be available at the Second Amendment Foundation book table at WAC gun shows.

    If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail me at [email protected] with the words “Unsubscribe GOAL Post” in the subject line.  I will remove your name immediately.  Keep in mind GOAL Post is also published on several gun lists.  If you received GP via a list, you must contact that list’s admin to unsubscribe.

    Upcoming WAC gun show(s):

    Monroe             14-15 February

    Puyallup         21-22 February

    “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.”

    Article 1, Section 24

    Constitution of the State of Washington

    Copyright 2015 Gun Owners Action League of WA

    Posted by: GOAL <[email protected]>

    Fight I-594  Donate now at: www.wagunrights.org

     

     

  • GOAL Post 2015-3: Legislative Update from Olympia 23 January 2015

    GOAL Post                                                  2015-3
    Legislative Update from Olympia                  23 January 2015

    CUT-OFF CALENDAR ADOPTED

    NEW BILLS FILED

    PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD

    PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED

    The legislature adopted the cut-off calendar for the session, the dates by which bills must pass certain hurdles or be considered dead for the session (although no bill is ever truly dead if leadership wants to revive it)

    The dates for the 2015 regular session are:

    12 Jan  First day of 105-day session

    20 Feb First policy committee cut-off

    27 Feb First fiscal committee cut-off (if required)

    11 Mar Chamber (House or Senate) cut-off (5 p.m.)

    1 Apr   Second chamber policy committee cut-off

    7 Apr   Second chamber fiscal committee cut-off (if required)

    15 Apr Second chamber cut-off

    26 Apr Legislature adjourns sine die

    Several new firearm-related bills have been filed

    HB 1324 (Shea, R-4) would put into statute the existing “castle doctrine” and “stand your ground/no duty to retreat” laws currently recognized by judicial decision; HB 1433 (Scott, R-38) modifies the state Gun Free School Zone law to more closely match federal law; HB 1474 (Taylor, R-15) would add defense against animal attack to existing self defense law; HB 1506 (Kirby, D-29) would exempt firearm transfers between licensed security guards from the background check provision of I-594; HB 1521 (Taylor, R-15) would restore the previous federal three day wait on a “delay” response from NICS from the 10 or more dfays imposed by I-594; and HB 1535 (Klippert, R-8) would waive the current three day waiting period on handgun deliveries for law enforcement officers

    (This is previous law, not I-594 related.)

    SB 5381 (Billig, D-3) creates a procedure whereby firearms seized or otherwise taken from citizens by law enforcement could ne returned, to include a mandatory three-day waiting period; SB 5476 (Dammeier, R-25) is the Senate counterpart to HB 1535; SB 5500 (Roach, R-31) allows retired law enforcement officer to carry firearms on school grounds; SB 5539, (Roach, R-31) also exempts law enforcement officers from the three day waiting period for handgun delivery; SB 5579 (Dammeier, R-25) also exempts licensed security guards from the background check provision of I-594; and SB 5615 (Benton, R-17) exempts military members from the background check provision of I-594.

    As you can see, some of these bills are an attempt to nibble away around the edges of I-594

    How successful they will be remains to be seen.

    Public hearings were held on four bills this past week, HBs 1119 (Blake D-19), 1131 (Pettigrew D-37), HB 1191 (Taylor R-15) and SB 5036 (O’Ban R-28)

    I normally try to provide information on the hearing, but my travel schedule precludes it at this time

    Keep in mind you can listen to hearings and floor sessions streamed live on TVWashington (see details below) or listed to archive podcasts of the hearings

    At this time, public hearings are scheduled for three bills next week:  a second hearing for HB 1131 (Pettigrew) D-37) in House Agriculture, a hearing for SB 5241 (Litzow R-41) in Senate Natural Resources, and a hearing for SB 5500 (Roach, R-31) in Senate Law & Justice.

    Regarding hearings on bills, committee chairs choose which bills to hear and which to ignore, although sometimes heavy public input can force a hearing on a bill

    The next week’s schedule is published on Wednesday, so bills filed later in the current week aren’t even considered for a hearing at this time

    As you can see in the bill introduction schedule for this week, most new bills filed failed to make the scheduling cut-off

    We have four more weeks for bills to pass out of the first policy committee, plenty of time

    Executive action (a committee vote) is expected on at least two bills next week: HBs 1119 and 1191

    As or when bills move out of committee, the “status” data will change in “Bill Status” below.

    Given the fact that leadership controls which bills move and which bills die, and the fact that the liberal side of the Democratic Party controls the House, I am not optimistic that any bills repealing or limiting the impact of I-594 will move

    An exception might be an attempt to horse-trade minor fixes to 594 in return for pro-gunners’ support of or simply silence on additional “common sense” gun control bills

    The next time a Democrat tells you he or she simply wants “gun safety” legislation, ask him or her to show you their safety instructor certification or even just a gun safety course completion certificate.

    Bill Status

    Bill #

    Subject

    Sponsor

    Status

    GOAL Position

    HB 1119 Hunter education issues Blake (D-19) H. AGR & NAT RES Pending
    HB 1131 Prohibits sale/purchase of ivory Pettigrew (D-37) H. AGR & NAT RES Oppose
    HB 1191 CPL renewal notices Taylor (R-15) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1193 Prohibiting gun owner data base Taylor (R-15) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1245 Repeals I-594   Shea (R-4) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1324 Codifies castle doctrine and stand your ground  Shea (R-4) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1433 Modifies Gun Free School Zone law Scott (R-39) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1474 Defense against animal attack    Taylor (R-15) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1506 Exempts security guard transfers from I-594 Kirby (D-29) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1521 Returns NICS “delay” to three days (I-594) Taylor (R-15) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1533 Exempting the transfer of a firearm donated to a historical society or museum for temporary exhibition and the transfer of the firearm back to the donor from the background check requirement Van Werven H Judiciary Support
    HB 1535 Exempts active LEOs from waiting period  Klippert (R-8) H Judiciary Support
    SB 5036 Penalizes criminal misuse of body armor O’ban (R-28) S. Law & Justice Neutral
    SB 5241 Prohibits sale/transfer of ivory Litzow (R-41) S. Nat Res/Parks Oppose
    SB 5381 Return of firearms held by law enforcement Billig (D-3) S. Law & Justice Oppose
    SB 5476 Exempts active LEOs from waiting period Dammeier (R-25) S. Law & Justice Support
    SB 5500 Permitting retired law enforcement officers to carry firearms on school facilities Roach (R-31) S. Law & Justice Support
    SB 5539 Concerning delivery of a pistol to a current law enforcement officer. Roach (R-31) S. Law & Justice Support
    SB 5579 Exempts licensed scty guards from b/g checks Dammeier (R-25) S. Law & Justice Support
    SB 5615 Exempts military members from b/g checks Benton (R-17) S. Law & Justice Support

    Key to abbreviations: S. = Senate, H. = House, Ag/NatRes = Agriculture/Natural Resources, HS&C = Human Services & Corrections, Jud = Judiciary, L&J = Law & Justice, , W&M = Ways and Means

    HEARINGS SCHEDULED:

    Bill Committee Room Building
    HB 1131 House Ag/Nat Res HHR “B,” John L. O’Brien
    27 Jan 10:00 a.m.
    SB 5241 Senate Nat Res SHR “B” John A. Cherberg
    28 Jan 2:00 p.m.
    SB 5500 Senate L&J SHR “1,” John A. Cherberg
    29 Jan 8: a.m.

     

    LEGISLATIVE HOT LINE:     You may reach your Representatives and Senator by calling the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000

    Toll free!!!       The hearing impaired may obtain TDD access at 1-800-635-9993

    Also toll free!!!

    1-800-562-6000          TDD 1-800-635-9993

    OTHER DATA:           Copies of pending legislation (bills), legislative schedules and other information are available on the legislature’s web site at “www.leg.wa.gov

    Bills are available in Acrobat (.pdf) format

    You may download a free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe’s web site (http://www.adobe.com)

    You may also obtain hard copy bills, initiatives, etc, in the mail from the Legislative Bill Room FREE OF CHARGE by calling 1-360-786-7573

    Copies of bills may also be ordered toll free by calling the Legislative Hotline at (800) 562-6000

    You may also hear floor and committee hearing action live at http://www.tvw.org/ (you need “RealAudio” to do this, available free at the TVW web site).

    By reading the House and Senate “bill reports” (hbr, sbr) for each bill, you can see how individual committee members voted

    By reading the “roll call” for each bill, you can see how the entire House or Senate voted on any bill

    The beauty of the web site is that ALL this information is available, on line, to any citizen.

    GET THE WORD OUT:          If you want to subscribe to the GOAL Post by e-mail, send a message to “[email protected]

    Please pass GOAL Post on to anyone you believe may have an interest in protecting our rights

    Better yet, make a couple of copies of this message, post it on your gun club’s bulletin board, and leave copies with your local gun shop(s)

    PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO DUPLICATE OR REDISTRIBUTE GOAL POST PROVIDED IT IS REPRODUCED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT TEXTUAL MODIFICATION AND CREDIT IS GIVEN TO GOAL

    I can be reached at “[email protected]” or by telephone at (425) 985-4867

    Unfortunately, I am unable to mail hard copy GOAL Post to individuals

    Limited numbers of hard copies MAY be available at the Second Amendment Foundation book table at WAC gun shows.

    If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail me at [email protected] with the words “Unsubscribe GOAL Post” in the subject line

    I will remove your name immediately

    Keep in mind GOAL Post is also published on several gun lists

    If you received GP via a list, you must contact that list’s admin to unsubscribe.

    Upcoming WAC gun show(s):

    Monroe                                  14-15 February

    Puyallup                                 21-22 February

    “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.”

    Article 1, Section 24

    Constitution of the State of Washington

    Copyright 2015 Gun Owners Action League of WA

     

  • GOAL Post Addenda

    GOAL Post Addenda                                                         2015-2a
    Legislative Update from Olympia                                         17 January 2015

    IVORY SALE/TRANSFER BAN

    HEARINGS SCHEDULED ON IVORY BAN

    First, about SB 5036, by Sen. Steve O’Ban (R-28):  SB 5036 would add a sentencing enhancement (increase) if an individual were to wear body armor during the commission of a felony.  While not a gun bill per se, many gun owners also own/use protective clothing.  Like firearm sentencing enhancements, we support them — when applied to criminals intentionally committing crimes.  But the potential exists for the law to be applied in situations where it is not intended (2nd/subsequent violation of I-594, for example).

    HB 1131, by Rep. Eric Pettigrew (D-37) and companion bill SB 5241, by Sen. Steve Litzow (R-41) would prohibit the sale or transfer of any product containing ivory from an elephant or mammoth or any product made from ivory horn.  There are limited exceptions to such sale/transfer.  Violation is a felony.

    Why is this appearing in GOAL Post?  We’re not aware of any market in rhinoceros horn pistol grips, but how about ivory?  New ivory products have been prohibited by federal law for years, but ivory grips made previously are still around, and popular with collectors.  Also, “ivory” isn’t necessarily “ivory.”  Ivory comes from several animals, not just elephants.  Wart hog and walrus tusks are common sources of ivory used in various products.  How is an arresting agent going to know the difference?

    Public hearings on both HB 1131 and SB 5241 will be held next week.  HB 1131 will be heard in House Agriculture Natural Resources committee on Tuesday, 20 January at 10:00 a.m. in House Hearing Room “B.”  SB 5241 will be heard in Senate Hearing Room “3” on Wednesday, 21 January at 1:30 p.m.

     

    Bill #

    Subject

    Sponsor

    Status

    GOAL Position

    HB 1119 Clarifying and streamlining various provisions of the existing Washington state Hunter Education Program Blake (D-19) H. AGR & NAT RES Pending
    HB 1131 Prohibits sale/purchase of ivory Pettigrew (D-37) H. AGR & NAT RES Oppose
    HB 1191 Mandating a renewal notice be mailed to CPL holders 90 days prior to license expiration Taylor (R-15) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1193 Eliminates the state pistol registry and prohibit the state from maintaining any data base of handgun purchasers Taylor (R-15) H. Judiciary Support
    HB 1245 Repealing Initiative Measure No. 594. Shea (R-4) H. Judiciary Support
    SB 5036 Creating a sentence enhancement for body armor. O’ban (R-28) S. Law & Justice Neutral
    SB 5241 Prohibits sale/purchase of ivory Litzow (R-41) S. Nat Res/Parks Oppose

    Key to abbreviations: S. = Senate, H. = House, Ag/NatRes = Agriculture/Natural Resources, HS&C = Human Services & Corrections, Jud = Judiciary, L&J = Law & Justice, , W&M = Ways and Means

    * = status change this past week

    HEARINGS SCHEDULED:

    SB 5036                             Senate L&J                      SHR 1.
    John A. Cherberg Building                                          19 Jan 1:30 p.m.

    HB 1119                             House Ag/NatRes             HHR
    John L. O’Brien Building                                              20 Jan 10:00 a.m.

    LEGISLATIVE HOT LINE: You may reach your Representatives and Senator by calling the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000. Toll free!!! The hearing impaired may obtain TDD access at 1-800-635-9993. Also toll free!!!

    1-800-562-6000 TDD 1-800-635-9993

    OTHER DATA: Copies of pending legislation (bills), legislative schedules and other information are available on the legislature’s web site at “www.leg.wa.gov“. Bills are available in Acrobat (.pdf) format. You may download a free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe’s web site (http://www.adobe.com). You may also obtain hard copy bills, initiatives, etc, in the mail from the Legislative Bill Room FREE OF CHARGE by calling 1-360-786-7573. Copies of bills may also be ordered toll free by calling the Legislative Hotline at (800) 562-6000. You may also hear floor and committee hearing action live at http://www.tvw.org/ (you need “RealAudio” to do this, available free at the TVW web site).

    By reading the House and Senate “bill reports” (hbr, sbr) for each bill, you can see how individual committee members voted. By reading the “roll call” for each bill, you can see how the entire House or Senate voted on any bill. The beauty of the web site is that ALL this information is available, on line, to any citizen.

    GET THE WORD OUT: If you want to subscribe to the GOAL Post by e-mail, send a message to “[email protected]“. Please pass GOAL Post on to anyone you believe may have an interest in protecting our rights. Better yet, make a couple of copies of this message, post it on your gun club’s bulletin board, and leave copies with your local gun shop(s). PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO DUPLICATE OR REDISTRIBUTE GOAL POST PROVIDED IT IS REPRODUCED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT TEXTUAL MODIFICATION AND CREDIT IS GIVEN TO GOAL. I can be reached at “[email protected]” or by telephone at (425) 985-4867. Unfortunately, I am unable to mail hard copy GOAL Post to individuals. Limited numbers of hard copies MAY be available at the Second Amendment Foundation book table at WAC gun shows.

    If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail me at [email protected] with the words “Unsubscribe GOAL Post” in the subject line. I will remove your name immediately. Keep in mind GOAL Post is also published on several gun lists. If you received GP via a list, you must contact that list’s admin to unsubscribe.

    Upcoming WAC gun show(s):

    Puyallup 17-18 January

    Monroe 14-15 February

    “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.”

    Article 1, Section 24

    Constitution of the State of Washington

  • GOAL Post 2015-2: Legislative Update from Olympia  -16 January 2015

    GOAL Post 2015-2: Legislative Update from Olympia -16 January 2015

    GOAL Post                                                                       2015-2
    Legislative Update from Olympia                                         16 January 2015

    RALLY A SUCCESS

    FEDERAL LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST I-594

    WHY GOAL POST DOES NOT ADDRESS PURELY HUNTING ISSUES

    NO CUT-OFF CALENDAR YET

    GUN BILLS FILED

    PUBLIC HEARING(S) SCHEDULED

    PUBLIC HEARINGS 101

    LEGISLATOR CONTACT INFORMATION POSTED

    A “Rally for your rights” was held on the Legislative Building steps on Thursday. Turnout was “several hundred,” significantly fewer than the “I will not comply” rally conducted last month — but that rally was held on the weekend, with no legislators present, while this one was on a work day, with all legislators present and available to hear from their constituents.

    As reported by SAF’s Dave Workman, one attendee noted, “Most of our people are at work, so they can pay taxes and support other people who come down here to restrict our rights.” About two dozen individuals from the “I will not comply” group were present, and reportedly some heckled lawmakers. That does not help. And why did they even bother? At last month’s rally they claimed they had already nullified I-594 by their civil disobedience, so why did they bother to come? (There’s nothing wrong with civil disobedience… in its place, as it was in December.). (BTW, those who chose to open carry inside the legislature after the rally may have provoked a move to ban such carry. There’s a time and a place for everything.)

    A lawsuit was filed last week in federal district court in Tacoma challenging many provisions of I-594, mostly dealing with various forms of “transfer.” Plaintiffs include several individual citizens, both Washingtonians and non-residents of Washington, firearms training facilities, private security/investigative services, and others. Each category of plaintiff has been negatively impacted by I-594, in different ways.

    We have been asked why I-594 was not simply challenged as a whole on constitutional grounds. The simple answer is, the suit would be dismissed almost immediately. Both the Heller (2008) and McDonald (2010) decisions by the Supreme Court upholding the right of the individual citizens to keep and bear arms allowed for various restrictions to remain in place. At this point, a piecemeal, provision by provision, challenge to 594 offers the greatest likelihood of success. Additional information may be found at http://www.saf.org/?p=4877

    The focus of the GOAL Post is on firearms-related legislation (90% of which is contained in RCW 9.41). We do not address Title 77 (hunting code) unless it impacts firearms directly. We will address bills having an impact on self defense and/or the use of lethal force (typically in RCW 9A.16 or 9A.36). The Hunters Heritage Council DOES track most Title 77 issues.

    The session cut-off calendar has yet to be published. The cut-off calendar contains all the dates by which bills must clear their policy committee or their chamber (House or Senate). Bills that fail to clear these hurdles are nominally dead for the remainder of the session, although exceptions can be made.

    Note that HB 1245, by Rep. Matt Shea (R-4) would repeal all provisions of I-594. (Recognize that for a two year period following adoption, it takes a 2/3 vote of the legislature to amend in any way an initiative passed by the people. HB 1245 is unlikely to gain that level of support, but Rep. Shea is making an important statement by filing the bill. Other action is current under way — both legislative and through litigation — to limit the impact of I-594.)

    Public hearings have been scheduled for next week for SB 5036 and HB 1119. The purpose of a public hearing is to gather information from the bill’s sponsor(s), other stakeholders (individuals or organizations with a direct interest in the bill), and members of the public. See the commentary below on how to participate in a public hearing. Most public hearings are two hours in length, with the time divided among several bills under consideration and other committee business to be addressed. Thus the time spent on each bill is limited. Keep in mind, too, that the committee chair has full discretion as to who is called to testify and who is not. SB 5036 will be heard in Senate Law & Justice on Monday, 19 January (the legislature does NOT close for holidays; both MLK Day and Presidents’ Birthday are legislative work days.). HB 1113 will be heard in the House Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee on 20 January. The hearing schedule appears below.

    As the name implies, public hearings on bills are open to the public. A sign-in sheet will typically be found on a table just inside or outside the hearing room. Attendees are not required to sign in, but may do so. If you wish to speak on a bill, or take a position on the bill (“pro” or “con”), you must sign in. If called upon to testify, there is usually a three minute limit on comments. You should keep it short and sweet, preferably no more than one or two points. If someone before you already made that point, do not repeat it. No personal attacks or attacks on the motives of other speakers are allowed. Just make a positive or negative statement about the content of the bill in question. You do not have to wear a coat and tie or business attire to attend or speak at a hearing, but you should dress neatly. Your appearance says a lot about YOU.

    The legislative web site is found at leg.wa.gov. Additional information is available at the following sites:

    House member info: http://leg.wa.gov/House/Representatives/Pages/default.aspx

    Senate member info: http://leg.wa.gov/Senate/Senators/Pages/default.aspx

    Combined House and Senate e-mail addresses: http://app.leg.wa.gov/memberemail/Default.aspx

    (Next week’s GOAL Post may run a day or so late as I will be at the annual Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trades (SHOT) show in Las Vegas. If I can’t send it out from my hotel room,. I’ll get it out when I get home.)

    Bill #

    Subject

    Sponsor

    Status

    GOAL Position

    HB 1119 Clarifying and streamlining various provisions of the existing Washington state Hunter Education Program Blake (D-19) AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES Pending
    HB 1191 Mandating a renewal notice be mailed to CPL holders 90 days prior to license expiration Taylor (R-15) H Judiciary Support
    HB 1193 Eliminates the state pistol registry and prohibit the state from maintaining any data base of handgun purchasers Taylor (R-15) H. Judiciary Support
    HB 1245 Repealing Initiative Measure No. 594. Shea (R-4) H. Judiciary Support
    SB 5036 Creating a sentence enhancement for body armor. O’ban (R-28) S. Law & Justice Neutral

    Key to abbreviations: S. = Senate, H. = House, Ag/NatRes = Agriculture/Natural Resources, HS&C = Human Services & Corrections, Jud = Judiciary, L&J = Law & Justice, , W&M = Ways and Means

    * = status change this past week

    HEARINGS SCHEDULED:

    SB 5036                             Senate L&J                      SHR 1.
    John A. Cherberg Building                                          19 Jan 1:30 p.m.

    HB 1119                             House Ag/NatRes             HHR
    John L. O’Brien Building                                              20 Jan 10:00 a.m.

    LEGISLATIVE HOT LINE: You may reach your Representatives and Senator by calling the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000. Toll free!!! The hearing impaired may obtain TDD access at 1-800-635-9993. Also toll free!!!

    1-800-562-6000 TDD 1-800-635-9993

    OTHER DATA: Copies of pending legislation (bills), legislative schedules and other information are available on the legislature’s web site at “www.leg.wa.gov“. Bills are available in Acrobat (.pdf) format. You may download a free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe’s web site (http://www.adobe.com). You may also obtain hard copy bills, initiatives, etc, in the mail from the Legislative Bill Room FREE OF CHARGE by calling 1-360-786-7573. Copies of bills may also be ordered toll free by calling the Legislative Hotline at (800) 562-6000. You may also hear floor and committee hearing action live at http://www.tvw.org/ (you need “RealAudio” to do this, available free at the TVW web site).

    By reading the House and Senate “bill reports” (hbr, sbr) for each bill, you can see how individual committee members voted. By reading the “roll call” for each bill, you can see how the entire House or Senate voted on any bill. The beauty of the web site is that ALL this information is available, on line, to any citizen.

    GET THE WORD OUT: If you want to subscribe to the GOAL Post by e-mail, send a message to “[email protected]“. Please pass GOAL Post on to anyone you believe may have an interest in protecting our rights. Better yet, make a couple of copies of this message, post it on your gun club’s bulletin board, and leave copies with your local gun shop(s). PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO DUPLICATE OR REDISTRIBUTE GOAL POST PROVIDED IT IS REPRODUCED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT TEXTUAL MODIFICATION AND CREDIT IS GIVEN TO GOAL. I can be reached at “[email protected]” or by telephone at (425) 985-4867. Unfortunately, I am unable to mail hard copy GOAL Post to individuals. Limited numbers of hard copies MAY be available at the Second Amendment Foundation book table at WAC gun shows.

    If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail me at [email protected] with the words “Unsubscribe GOAL Post” in the subject line. I will remove your name immediately. Keep in mind GOAL Post is also published on several gun lists. If you received GP via a list, you must contact that list’s admin to unsubscribe.

    Upcoming WAC gun show(s):

    Puyallup 17-18 January

    Monroe 14-15 February

    “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.”

    Article 1, Section 24

    Constitution of the State of Washington

  • GOAL Post 2015-1: Legislative Update from Olympia 9 January 2015

    GOAL Post 2015-1: Legislative Update from Olympia 9 January 2015

    GOAL Post 2015-1

    Legislative Update from Olympia 9 January 2015

    • “RALLY FOR YOUR RIGHTS” IN OLY
    • LEGISLATURE CONVENES MONDAY, 12 JANUARY
    • SPLIT CONTROL CONTINUES
    • LEGISLATIVE TUTORIAL
    • LEGISLATIVE CALENDAR
    • PRE-FILED FIREARMS BILLS
    • LEGISLATOR DIRECT CONTACT INFORMATION
    Mark your calendar!  On Thursday, 15 January, a pro-gun rally, the Rally for Your Rights, will be held on the Capitol Campus in Olympia.  The rally is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m., with presentations by leaders in the gun rights movement and several legislators, followed by a visit to your legislators’ offices.  This is your opportunity to speak directly with your elected officials.  Contact information will be available at the rally.  Sponsoring organizations include the Washington Arms Collectors, Washington State Rifle & Pistol Association, Gun Owners Action League of WA, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Second Amendment Foundation, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, and others.The 64th Washington state legislature convenes Monday, January 12th for its long (105 day) session.  The principal focus of the long legislative session is supposed to be the biennial budget, but rest assured several other topics, including firearms, will receive attention.

    Control of the legislature remains split, with Democrats in charge of the House (51 Democrats to 47 Republicans), and Republicans continuing the Majority Coalition in the Senate, with 26 Majority Coalition members (25 Republicans and one Democrat) versus 23 Democrats.  We can also count on a handful of pro-gun House Democrats siding with gun owners on legislation of interest.

    For those new to legislative affairs, here’s how the process works:  When a bill is filed in the House or Senate (or both, simultaneously, called “companion bills”) it is assigned to a policy committee.  Most gun-related bills go to the Senate Law & Justice Committee in  the Senate.  In the House it’s a little more complicated, as it may be sent to House Judiciary or House Public Safety (most will go to Judiciary).  Public hearings may be held, after which the bill may (or may not) be voted out of committee.  If the bill has a fiscal impact (usually an expenditure of more than $50,000), it must then go to Senate Ways & Means or one of a couple of House fiscal committees.  The bill then goes to the Senate or House Rules Committee, where it must be voted on to pass out to the floor for a full vote.

    After a bill passes the Senate or House, it then goes over to the opposite chamber (House or Senate), where the whole process starts over again.  If the bill passes the second chamber in the same form it passed the first, it goes to the governor for signature (or veto or partial veto).  If changes are made in the second chamber, it goes back to the first for concurrence.  It may also go to a conference committee from both chambers to resolve differences.  The final version must pass both chambers.

    The bill then goes to the Governor, who may sign it into law, veto (kill) the bill, or sign a partial veto (killing just selected section(s) of the bill).  The governor may also allow a bill to become law without his signature.  Most signed bills take effect on 1 July, although bills with an “emergency clause” (considered immediately necessary for public safety) take effect upon signature by the governor.

    One of the first items of business in each session is the adoption of the session calendar, identifying dates by which bills must clear various hurdles.  A bill that fails to clear the policy committee or chamber floor by the designated date is generally considered dead for the year, although they may be “resurrected” by parliamentary procedure.  I’ll post the cut-off dates for the 2015 session in the next issue of GOAL Post.

    Bills from the last session are dead.  New bills must be filed for consideration by the 64th Legislature, with new bill numbers.  At this time no firearm-related bills have been pre-filed.

    The Legislature has not yet published new telephone and office directories because legislators are not sworn in until Monday, 12 January.  The following links can be used at that time to identify direct contact information:

    http://www.leg.wa.gov/Senate/Senators/
    http://www.leg.wa.gov/House/Representatives/

    Legislative e-mail addresses will be available at http://app.leg.wa.gov/MemberEmail/Default.aspx

    Your elected legislators and their contact information is available by inserting your residence zip code at http://apps.leg.wa.gov/DistrictFinder/Default.aspx

    BILL STATUS: No firearm-related bills have been filed at this time.

    GOAL POSITION ON BILLS: No bills filed at this time

    HEARINGS SCHEDULED: None scheduled

    LEGISLATIVE HOT LINE:  You may reach your Representatives and Senator by calling the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000.  Toll free!!!  The hearing impaired may obtain TDD access at 1-800-635-9993.  Also toll free!!!

    1-800-562-6000   TDD 1-800-635-9993

    OTHER DATA:  Copies of pending legislation (bills), legislative schedules and other information are available on the legislature’s web site at “www.leg.wa.gov“.  Bills are available in Acrobat (.pdf) format.  You may download a free version of Adobe Acrobat Reader from Adobe’s web site (http://www.adobe.com).  You may also obtain hard copy bills, initiatives, etc, in the mail from the Legislative Bill Room FREE OF CHARGE by calling 1-360-786-7573.  Copies of bills may also be ordered toll free by calling the Legislative Hotline at (800) 562-6000.  You may also hear floor and committee hearing action live at http://www.tvw.org/ (you need “RealAudio” to do this, available free at the TVW web site).

    By reading the House and Senate “bill reports” (hbr, sbr) for each bill, you can see how individual committee members voted.  By reading the “roll call” for each bill, you can see how the entire House or Senate voted on any bill.  The beauty of the web site is that ALL this information is available, on line, to any citizen.

    GET THE WORD OUT:  If you want to subscribe to the GOAL Post by e-mail, send a message to “[email protected]“.  Please pass GOAL Post on to anyone you believe may have an interest in protecting our rights.  Better yet, make a couple of copies of this message, post it on your gun club’s bulletin board, and leave copies with your local gun shop(s).  PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO DUPLICATE OR REDISTRIBUTE GOAL POST PROVIDED IT IS REPRODUCED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT TEXTUAL MODIFICATION AND CREDIT IS GIVEN TO GOAL.  I can be reached at “[email protected]” or by telephone at (425) 985-4867.  Unfortunately, I am unable to mail hard copy GOAL Post to individuals.  Limited numbers of hard copies MAY be available at the Second Amendment Foundation book table at WAC gun shows.

    If you believe you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail me at “[email protected]” with the words “Unsubscribe GOAL Post” in the subject line.  I will remove your name immediately.  Keep in mind GOAL Post is also published on several gun lists.  If you received GP via a list, you must contact that list’s admin to unsubscribe.

    Upcoming WAC gun show(s):
    Puyallup: 17-18 January
    Monroe: 14-15 February

    “The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain or employ an armed body of men.”
    Article 1, Section 24
    Constitution of the State of Washington

    Copyright 2015 Gun Owners Action League of WA

  • GOAL endorses WAFLAG 1/15/15 Legislative Rally at Capitol

    GOAL endorses WAFLAG 1/15/15 Legislative Rally at Capitol

    011515rally_fbcoverThe Gun Owners Action League, today announced that it would join the Washington Arms Collectors, I Love Guns & Coffee,  the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership and the Second Amendment Foundation as sponsors of the January 15th I-594: Rally for Your Rights at 9:00 a.m. at the Capitol in Olympia.

    Rally hosts include private individuals and organizations including Protect Our Gun Rights WashingtonPink Pistols, WaGuns.org and the Gun Rights Coalition operating through the umbrella group Washington Firearms Leadership and Advocacy Group.

    GOAL has been a major force protecting and restoring Second Amendment rights in Olympia for over twenty years with its dedicated efforts to defeat ill-considered legislation attacking firearms owners and to press for laws recognizing and protecting fundamental firearms rights and an early supporter of efforts opposing the poorly written and deeply misguided I-594. Often fighting uphill battles against anti-gun legislative majorities and governors, GOAL has consistently held its ground or made actual advances in the face of long odds.

    Joined on the legislative scene by Protect Our Gun Rights Washington, GOAL will only be more effective with a strong ally by its side.

    GOAL’s efforts – whether through direct legislative action or through supporting pro-gun candidates – have held the line nearly alone for Washington gun owners rights for decades. Today they are being reinforced with grass roots support, new allies in Olympia and ever more vital relationships on both sides of the aisle.

    Join GOAL and your fellow gun owners at the January 15th Rally for Your Rights to hear a wide variety of gun rights viewpoints before visiting your legislator and helping them understand the importance of repealing or amending I-594 and other bad gun laws.

    WAFLAG will provide help at the rally to folks unsure of who their legislator is and how best to meet with them. In the meantime, locate your legislator by going to www.app.leg.wa.gov/districtfinder/ or contact the legislative hotline at 1-800-562-6000. Let them know your views!

    Be Present. Be Effective. Fight the Fight!

  • GOAL Alert 4-2014

    GOAL Alert                                                                                                 4-2014
    Election update                                                                            9 November 2014

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MARINES

    SILVER LINING

    MOMENTUM FOR GUN CONTROL?

    I-594: WHAT NEXT?

    WARNING!!!

    THE OTHER WASHINGTON

    Tomorrow, 10 November 2014, is the 239th birthday of the U.S. Marine Corps.  Happy birthday to all of my Marine brethren and to our “FMF Corpsman,” the highest calling in the Navy.  Right after “Semper fidelis” comes “Corpsman up!”    (The devil made me put that in GOAL Post.)

    47% of the registered voters in Washington took the trouble to return their mail-in ballots this time around.  Shame on any gun owners who failed to vote.

    For gun owners, the passage of I-594 will no doubt dominate the discussion, and I’ll get to that next.  But there is a silver lining in the election.  My biggest fear the day before the election was that I-594 supporters would use their $9 MILLION bank account to conduct a massive get-out-the-vote (GOTV) campaign.  Without question that would have had a spillover effect on the legislative elections.  But apparently they didn’t — and it didn’t.

    The overall result of the legislative elections was a net plus for Republicans.  Former Democrat Representative and now Republican Senator-elect Mark Miloscia (R-30-Federal Way) won his bid to replace retiring Democrat Tracy Eide, giving Republicans clear majority control of the state Senate, 25R-24D.  Add to that the fact that nominally-Democrat Senator Tim Sheldon beat off an attempt by Party loyalists to run a Democrat challenger, Irene Bowling, against him.  No doubt with a lot of help from Republican voters in the 35th, Tim won his election, and will no doubt continue to work with Republicans in the Majority Coalition.  (And congratulations to WAC Honorary Life Member Pam Roach (R-31) for her victory over a Republican challenger.)

    On the House side, the GOP picked up four seats, and a fifth seat awaits a recount vote.  Welcome Representatives-elect Lynda Wilson (R-17) (also an NRA-certified firearms safety instructor), Melanie Stambaugh (R-25), Michelle Caldier (R-26) and Dan Griffey (R-35).  All four defeated incumbent Democrats.  That gives us a House make-up of 51Ds-47Rs, not a Republican majority, but a lot closer.  All but one of the pro-gun Democrats also won reelection, so from a purely gun rights perspective, we should be in good shape.

    Immediately following the election, in press conferences crowing about their initiative victory, I-594 supporters promised an aggressive gun control campaign in the next legislative session, looking at things like “assault weapon” bans, magazine capacity limits, mandatory safe storage, etc.  At least theoretically, a Republican-controlled Senate and a pro-gun majority in the House should bring all such designs to a rapid halt.  But politics doesn’t always work that way, especially in the House where control still rests with Democrats, and leadership decides which bills move and which bills die.  There is no doubt gun control advocates believe momentum is on their side, and they’ll attempt to exploit it.

    As for I-594, at this point there are more questions than answers.  Given the ambiguity of many provisions in the initiative, it’s going to boil down to a question of interpretation, followed by a decision of what will be enforced, in which way.  Without doubt you can expect full enforcement of background checks at gun shows and for any other permanent transfer (sale) of a firearm.  While a strict reading of the provisions for loans, etc, would call for background checks here, too, that’s going to be difficult to enforce, and it remains to be seen what guidance will be given to police.  This should all be hashed out before the initiative takes effect on 4 December, a day before the WAC gun show in Monroe, coincidentally!

    There are discussions underway about how to attack 594, and how to limit its impact on law-abiding gun owners.  As an initiative passed by the people, for two years any legislative fixes would take a 2/3 majority vote of the legislature — and that ain’t gonna happen.  But there are potentially some legislative actions that can be taken around the to ameliorate the impact.  Court challenges are also a possibility, for portions of the initiative.  Again, the issue is being worked.  More on that as they develop.

    I’ll be publishing more information about enforcement, and the gun community’s reaction to it, as the effective date approaches.

    WARNING!  I expect our law enforcement professionals to be exactly that — professionals. While most did not support I-594, now that it is law they have a duty to enforce it, as interpreted by their chain-of-command.

    What I DO expect to see is attempted stings — entrapment scenarios played out, especially at venues like gun shows.  Not by police officers, but by 594 supporters.  You get out of your car at the gun show, pull a shotgun out of the trunk and head for the gate.  It wouldn’t surprise me to see someone approach you and make an offer for the shotgun.  You ask, “What about the background check,” and the “buyer” responds, “Hey, who’s to see or know?”  The person that will see and know is the guy the next lane over, with his cellphone camera or videocam up and running, recording the whole transaction.  And that will force our police friends into enforcing a law they may not like or agree with, but it’s the law.

    DO NOT GET TRAPPED.  LIKE IT OR NOT, FOLLOW THE LAW UNTIL WE GET IT SORTED OUT!

    By now the whole world knows that Republicans have taken control of the U.S. Senate, giving them a 52-46 majority in that body.  Two seats are still up for grabs, both likely to go to Republicans, giving them 54-46 control when the new, 114th, Congress convenes in January.  The only thing we know for sure at this point is that it will be an interesting two years!

    Hopefully Republicans understand that the election results were not so much an embrace of Republican policies and principles as it was a rejection of Obama policies.  There’s a big difference there, obviously.  But it’s hard for someone who just won an election to think that it wasn’t so much his or her winning personality as much as dislike for the other guy — or the other guy’s surrogate, President Obama.

    It wasn’t particularly encouraging to hear the president say that he not only heard the voters, he heard “the voice of those that did not vote.”  Huh?  He’s hearing voices?  Is this the same guy who said in 2012, “If you don’t like my policies, go win an election.”  Well, they did.  In 1994, after the Democrat disaster that saw Republicans take control of both chambers of Congress, then-President and master politician Bill Clinton acknowledged that some of the loss was due to his policies, and he accepted full responsibility for that.  Three words you will NEVER hear Barack Obama say are, “I accept responsibility.”

    In 1995 and beyond, Clinton moved to the center, worked with Republicans on many issues, and passed landmark legislation such as welfare reform (since overturned by a stroke of Obama’s executive pen).  President Obama is still threatening us with that executive pen, apparently with immigration “reform” (i.e. amnesty) at the top of the list.  And how close to the top is gun control?

    One clear outcome is that for the first time in his presidency, Obama will have to take responsibility for using that pen, whether for executive orders that exceed his authority or for use of the veto.  For the past four years, the Republican-controlled House has been passing bill after bill, only to have them stonewalled in the Senate by Harry Reid.  Reid has been running interference for Obama.

    That firewall is gone.  Bills will now move to the president’s desk, and if he vetoes them, we will know where the “gridlock:” lies.  Expect a lot of, “Well, the Republicans MADE me veto the bill, it’s not my fault.  They knew I wouldn’t sign it.”  I guess that’s an improvement from pointing the finger at George W. Bush!

    One last shot.  53% of your fellow citizens did not vote in the election.  The next time someone complains to you about the effect of I-594, ask them if they voted.  If they didn’t, you know where the blame lies.  Shame on them.

    The next legislative session begins on 12 January.  I expect to start publishing GOAL Post a week prior to that.

  • GOAL Alert 3-2014 Election update

    GOAL Alert                                                                                             3-2014
    Election update                                                                         22 October 2014

    TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE GUEST COLUMNIST OPPOSES I-594

    MAJORITY OF WASHINGTON SHERIFFS NOW OPPOSE 594

    MAJORITY OF RANK AND FILE WASHINGTON COPS OPPOSE 594

    WHY ARE YOU RECEIVING THIS ALERT?

    The following article was published in the Tacoma News Tribune on Sunday, 19 October.  The author, Phil Shave, is the retired Chief of Law Enforcement for Washington State Parks and a long-time instructor with the Criminal Justice Training Commission.  He is currently the Executive Director of the Washington Arms Collectors (WAC).

    http://www.thenewstribune.com/2014/10/19/3437947/no-on-i-594-dont-turn-neighbors.html

    NO ON 594:  DON’T TURN NEIGHBORS INTO ACCIDENTAL CRIMINALS

    Would you vote for a law that would make criminals of half your neighbors? Initiative 594 would do exactly that.

    In their zeal to impose “universal background checks,” the creators of I-594 have written a law that would require nearly all “transfers” of firearms to be conducted at the premises of a Federal Firearms License (FFL) dealer.

    I-594 defines transfers as a change of possession, no matter how temporary, including gifts and loans. There are exceptions for family gifts, organized competitions and youth activities, but they are so narrow that most recreational, non-sale transfers would be crimes.

    The father who loans a hunting rifle to an adult son during hunting season would commit a misdemeanor (upon the first violation). When the rifle is returned, both father and son would be two-time offenders, and thus felons under I-594.

    Shooting buddies who met on public land or their own property to target practice with shared firearms would violate I-594. Routine gun repairs would also be criminalized. The initiative would effectively forbid you from dropping your firearm off with a gunsmith friend unless he had a federal license. Most gunsmiths in this state, often the most skilled, lack federal licenses.

    Women are targeted by several provisions. Instructors could no longer provide loaner firearms during introductory women’s self-defense classes. And if your sister were being stalked and in fear of her life, and you loaned her a firearm, you would both be criminals. I-594 has an exception to “prevent imminent death,” but the legal definition of imminent means “about to happen.”

    Widows and heirs beware: If your spouse died and you found a couple of handguns in your husband’s sock drawer 61 days after death, then you’d be an accidental felon.

    I-594 only allows you 60 days to register those guns; after that, they’d become contraband. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and intent to commit a crime is not an element written into 594. Why write a law that makes inheritance of grandpa’s old guns a crime?

    Colorado passed a law in 2013 requiring universal background checks, but the Colorado law includes exceptions for temporary transfers without change of ownership, transfers while hunting or target shooting, transfers for gun repairs and loans for 72 hours. The transfer fee is capped at a reasonable $10 (fees are unlimited in I-594).

    If only I-594 were that reasonable. Failure to complete the Colorado paperwork is a misdemeanor, whereas I-594 makes the first offense a gross misdemeanor and the second a Class C felony.

    I urge you to follow the lead of our state’s law enforcement officers, those who deal with crime and criminals on a daily basis; they oppose I-594 and support passage of Initiative 591. Vote yes on I-591 because it leaves intact our current background check laws while allowing our state to implement future enhancements adopted at the federal level for all 50 states.

    I-594’s penalty provisions are one huge reason that law enforcement officers oppose this flawed initiative. Its promoters cleverly revised the law to define an I-594 felony as a “serious” offense, placing it in the same category as child molestation, third-degree rape, leading organized crime and drive-by shootings.

    You could loan your gun to a friend for the weekend, and the judge hearing your paperwork crime would have to follow “serious” crime-sentencing guidelines, including consecutive sentences for these newly defined “serious” crimes.

    No law enforcement organization supports Initiative 594.

    The Washington Council of Police and Sheriffs represents the majority of law enforcement line-level officers in our state; it opposes the initiative. The Washington State Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors Association opposes it. These are the firearm professionals who would be tasked with enforcing this unreasonable law.

    Nineteen elected sheriffs oppose I-594. They understand that the initiative will consume scarce resources in the prosecution and imprisonment of its accidental violators.

    (When Phil’s column was submitted to the T-N-T, nineteen sheriffs had joined us in opposing I-594.  In the past few days, six more sheriffs have climbed aboard, bringing the total to 25 of the state’s 39 county sheriffs.)

    As noted above, 25 county sheriffs have added their names to the list of those opposing I-594.  In addition to their law enforcement expertise in addressing this issue, there is one more important thing you should understand:  all of these sheriffs are ELECTED OFFICIALS, and answerable to their constituents.

    At this time, the 25 sheriffs who are opposing I-594 are (in county alphabetical order):

    Sheriff John Hunt — Adams County

    Sheriff Steven Keane – Benton County

    Sheriff Brian Burnett — Chelan County

    Sheriff Bill Benedict – Clallam County

    Sheriff Rocky MIller — Columbia County

    Sheriff Mark Nelson — Cowlitz County

    Sheriff Harvey Gjesdal – Douglas County

    Sheriff Pete Warner — Ferry County

    Sheriff Richard Lathim – Franklin County

    Sheriff Ben Keller — Garfield County

    Sheriff Thomas Jones – Grant County

    Sheriff Rick Scott – Grays Harbor County

    Sheriff Rick McComas — Klickitat County

    Sheriff Steve Mansfield — Lewis County

    Sheriff Wade Magers – Lincoln County

    Sheriff Frank Rogers — Okanogan County

    Sheriff Scott Johnson — Pacific County

    Sheriff Alan Botzheim — Pend Orielle County

    Sheriff Dave Brown, Skamania County

    Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich — Spokane County

    Sheriff Kendle Allen – Stevens County

    Sheriff John Snaza – Thurston County

    Sheriff Mark Howie – Wahkiakum County

    Sheriff John Turner – Walla Walla County

    Sheriff Brett Myers — Whitman County

    If YOUR sheriff isn’t on this list, you might ask him why?

    Note that sheriffs AND rank and file police officers — the officers that actually patrol the streets, oppose 594 and support 591.  The Washington Council of Police and Sheriffs (WACOPS), the largest police union in Washington representing a majority of sworn officers, has formally adopted a position opposing I-594 and supporting I-591.  The same is true of the Washington State Law Enforcement Firearm Instructors Association (WSLEFIA).  Who would know better the negative impact of I-594 than these dedicated officers.

    What about police chiefs?  As noted above, sheriffs are elected by residents of their county.  They pay attention to their constituents.  Rank and file officers that daily patrol our streets have minds of their own, and opinions of their own  Neither support 594.

    So how about chiefs?  One thing to keep in mind:  police chiefs work for City Hall, and hold their positions at the pleasure of the mayor or city council.  Their opinions tend to match those of their bosses.  Having said that, police chiefs statewide are represented by the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs — WASPC.  WASPC does not have a dog in this fight, they’re neutral.

    Why are you receiving this e-mail?  Theoretically no one on this list should need this e-mail.  I would hope all of you are going to vote the right way on both initiatives:  YES on 591, NO on 594.  So why am I preaching to the choir, as it were?

    Because we need YOUR HELP in getting the word out — to fellow gun owners who are not as politically-attuned as are you, and more importantly to the non-gun owning voters out there who are NOT getting the full story, especially on I-594.  Our budget is extremely limited.  The other side has nearly $9 MILLION to throw into television, radio and print media advertising.

    As Joseph Goebbels observed more than 70 years ago, if you repeat a big lie often enough, people WILL believe it. And that is what billionaires Michael Bloomberg, Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, Paul Allen and Chip Hanauer are counting on (all with private security details).  They don’t need to fool all of the people all of the time, they only need to fool 51% of the people through election day.

    I’m sending this information out in the hope that YOU will pick up pen, or sit at keyboard, and help get the word out to others.  A simple and cheap way to do this is letters to the editor of your local newspaper.  Newspapers DO print letters whose position they do not agree with.  Over the years I have been reasonably successful in getting several letters published in the Seattle Times and P-I, no friends of gun owners.

    Letters should be brief — ideally 150 words or less, and limited to one or two points.  Taking your cue from this alert, you might bring out the fact that law enforcement statewide is opposed to I-594 and supports I-591.  That message is NOT being conveyed by the mainstream media.  This is your opportunity to do that, using their print space!

    E-mail and snail mail addresses for your paper’s Letters to the Editor may be found on the letters page, usually in a box at the side or on the bottom.  Policy on word limits are usually there, too, but 150 is a good number.  Enough to get your point across.

    I haven’t said much about I-591 here.  I’m saving that for another alert.  But it’s there on the ballot, too, and it needs and deserves your YES vote.  That’s another way of fighting 594.

  • GOAL Alert – Election Update – 2-2014

    GOAL Alert                                                                                             2-2014
    Election update                                                                         17 October 2014

    IT’S CRUNCH TIME

    BALLOTS WENT IN THE MAIL TODAY

    THE FUTURE OF GUN RIGHTS IN WASHINGTON IS IN YOUR HANDS

    VOTE NO ON 594            VOTE YES ON 591

    VOTE NOW

    While the campaigning will go on for another 18 days, ballots went in the mail today.  You’ll receive yours with a day or three.  Washington is one of four 100% vote-by-mail states; no lining up at a polling place to cast your ballot.  The one in your mail box is the only one you’ll get.  A disadvantage of vote-by-mail is no ID is required to get the ballot — whoever has access to your mail box has access to your ballot.  Look for it, open it, fill it out, and get it back in the mail.

    GOAL just funded a special mailing of 100,000+ postcards to 11 selected districts we believe are critical to the election.  You may or may not receive one.  The NRA has done the same thing with its nearly 100,000 members in Washington.  GOAL postcards started arriving on Friday, 17 October.

    Those of you who read my monthly legislative news column in the Washington Arms Collector’s Gun-News have already read most of this.  But for the many GOAL Post subscribers who are not WAC members, here’s some background on the endorsement process.

    I used two guiding principles in preparing the list, which was provided to the Washington Arms Collectors for their approval, and to the GOAL trustees for the same.  The first was to identify and start the list with those “righteous Democrats” who have been supporting Washington’s gun owners for the past decade or more.  (More on those selections later.)  We owe them.

    Next up was pro-gun Republicans, followed by “any Republican.”  We have endorsed a few Libertarian candidates when Washington’s “high two” system left no more suitable candidate.  (For the record, I’m a conservative “small-l Libertarian; but we live in a two party system, and your chances of winning election if you do not have an (R) or a (D) after your name are almost impossible.  I know many libertarian elected officials, but all ran as Republicans.)  Finally, there are several “No recommendation” listings.  In these cases, neither of the candidates would do anything to enhance gun rights in Washington.

    Why support Republicans who are weak on the gun issue?  Because it solidifies Republican control of a chamber (House or Senate), if that can be achieved.  And with strong pro-gun leadership in both chambers, we don’t have to worry how they might vote because bad bills will never make it to the floor for a vote.

    There are a couple (literally, two) of dual endorsements on the list, the “xxx OR yyy” candidates.  I don’t like dual endorsements.  It tends to confuse voters.  But sometimes you have to do what you have to do.

    I’ve received half a dozen calls already today regarding the candidates listed on our postcards, or listed in the WAC Gun-News.  Most disagreement focused on the Democrats we endorsed.  The big questions was “WHY?”  I’ll use the following two examples to answer;

    The Democrats had solid control of the legislature from 2001 to 2013.  In 2013, two Democrats sided with the (then) 23 Republicans in the state Senate to revolt and seize control, calling themselves the “Majority Coalition Caucus”.  So for two years, control of the legislature has been split, but the Democrats retained solid control of the House.

    In the past 13 years, more than 50 anti-gun bills have been filed — “assault weapon” bans, “gun show loophole,” universal background checks, expanded public place bans, etc, etc.  You name it, it was filed.  But none passed.  Why?

    Because a handful of Democrats in the legislature, House and Senate both, stood WITH their constituents and AGAINST their leadership and their more liberal Democrat colleagues, at great political risk to themselves.  Several were threatened with primary challenges, and in Senator Tim Sheldon’s case that’s where we are today.  This handful of Democrats, with the Republican minority, were able to block all of the anti-gun legislation proposed.

    We owe those Democrats.  Big time.  I/we don’t agree with them on every issue, but we all agree on the gun issue.  And that’s what this is all about.  Preserving our gun rights.

    Specifically regarding Representative Pat Sullivan, Pat is the House Majority leader, the Speaker’s principal adviser on which bills to bring to the floor for a vote and which bills to let die.  Pat is the man who convinced House Speaker Frank Chopp to NOT bring House Bill (HB) 1588 up for a vote almost two years ago.  You recall HB 1588 don’t you?  It’s the universal background check bill they tried to slip through after the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting.  Pat, and six or seven of his fellow Democrats stood up to the Speaker and refused to vote for the bill, thus guaranteeing it’s defeat.  Seeing the handwriting on the wall, Speaker Chopp wisely decided to let the bill die.  We owe several Democrat Representatives for their support for gun owners, but Pat Sullivan leads the pack.

    Senator Tim Sheldon, the majority Coalition’s Senate President Pro Tem, has been standing with gun owners for more than 20 years.  It was his deciding vote in 1994 that killed the amendment that would have required training to obtain a concealed pistol license.  (Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been a certified firearms safety instructor for 40 years.  I firmly believe that anyone who chooses to exercise his or her Second Amendment rights has a moral obligation to do so safely, to the extent they can afford training.  But I don’t believe the state has any business interfering in a fundamental Constitutional right.  Just as the Supreme Court ruled poll tests were unconstitutional decades ago, so should state-mandated training.)  Tim flew around the state with us in 1997, opposing I-676, the so-called trigger lock initiative” that was actually a handgun possessor (that’s right, possessor, not just an owner) licensing bait-and-switch initiative (much as today’s I-594 is a bait-and-switch background check initiative).  Sheldon now faces a liberal Democrat, Irene Bowling.  We need to keep Sheldon in place to keep the Senate in Republican hands AND protect YOUR gun rights.

    Those two, and a handful of other brave DEMOCRATS who stand between you and just about every imaginable gun control law.

    If you compare the lists, you will see that the NRA and GOAL are in about 99% agreement.  We run our endorsement process somewhat differently, however.   The NRA assigns grades based on known voting records for incumbents.  They then send out questionnaires to new candidates, and based on the response to those questionnaires, assigns grades.  They endorse specific candidates, but give you the grade rating for both candidates in the race.  You choose.  That’s probably a more “fair” way to do it.  The problem with questionnaires is, candidates can lie.

    GOAL takes a different tack.  GOAL only lists a single candidate for each position, in effect a push-poll to direct you to the candidate we believe best suits the interests of Washington gun owners.  If you want “fair,” visit Puyallup in September.  Different approach, hopefully the same result.  I’ve provided a link to the NRA’s list below, as well as the entire GOAL endorsement list.

    And we have the two initiatives on the ballot.  I’m not going to go into any real detail on either of them.  I-594, the universal background check initiative is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, full of hidden traps and penalties.  That’s why they needed 18 pages to accomplish what the legislature tried to do in HB 1588 in two pages.  I-591 simply restates existing law:  no confiscation of firearms without due process of law (as happened in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina) and no background checks beyond those mandated by federal law.  Some of my 10th Amendment friends are unhappy with that.  They feel we shouldn’t support federal law, period.  I live in a real world.  And I’m not about to risk five years in Club Fed by violating that law, 10th Amendment or not.  For all practical purposes, the 10th Amendment died about a century ago.

    The outcome of the initiative votes will have a major impact on how the gun business is conducted in Washington, and how gun shows are conducted.  If 594 passes and becomes law, expect to pay a $25-50 FFL fee EVERY TIME you “transfer” a firearm — this includes loans as well as sales.  And when a loan is transferred back.  Plus a use tax nearly equal to the state sales tax.  Yes, I-594 waives sales tax for private transfers, but if you read the fiscal note from the Office of Financial Management, you’ll see that when the sales tax is waived on the transfer of property, a “use tax” in imposed.

    VOTE NO ON 594.    VOTE YES ON 591.   It’s a no-brainer.

    It’s up to you now.  GOAL’s endorsements, and the NRA’s, are simply suggestions: our best judgment of who will best represent your gun rights in D.C. and Olympia.  But the choice is yours.  And please, please, mark your ballot and get it back in the mail ASAP.  Don’t take a chance on misplacing it, or forgetting to get it in on time.  MAIL IT NOW.

     

     

    NRA endorsements can be found at https://www.nrapvf.org/grades/washington/

     

    GOAL ENDORSEMENTS:

     

     

    CONGRESSIONAL RACES

     

    1st        Pedro Celis (R)

    2nd      B. J. Guillot (R)

    3rd       Jaime Herrera Beutler (R)

    4th       Dan Newhouse (R) or

    Clint Didier (R)

    5th       Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R)

    6th       Marty McClendon (R)

    7th       Craig Keller (R)

    8th       Dave Reichert (R)

    9th       Doug Basler (R)

    10th     Joyce McDonald (R)

    Supreme Court    1     No recommendation

    3    No recommendation

    4    Charles Johnson

    7    No recommendation

     

    LEGISLATIVE RACES

     

    Dist.     Position           Name

     

    1          House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           Edward Barton (R)

     

    2          House 1           Graham Hunt (R)

    House 2           J. T. Wilcox (R)

     

    3          House 1           Tim Benn (R)

    House 2           Paul Delaney (L)

     

    4          House 1           Bob McCaslin (R)

    House 2           Matt Shea (R)

     

    5          House 1           Jay Rodne (R)

    House 2           Chad Magendanz (R)

     

    6          Senate              Michael Baumgartner (R)

    House 1           Kevin Parker (R)

    House 2           Jeff Holy (R)

     

    7          Senate              Brian Dansel (R)

    House 1           Shelly Short (R)

    House 2           Joel Kretz (R)

     

    8          Senate              Sharon Brown (R)

    House 1           Brad Klippert (R)

    House 2           Larry Haler (R)

     

    9          House 1           Susan Fagan (R)

    House 2           Joe Schmick (R)

     

    10        House 1           Norma Smith (R)

    House 2           Dave Hayes (R)

     

    11        House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           Sarah Sanoy-Wright (R)

     

    12        House 1           Cary Condotta (R)

    House 2           Brad Hawkins (R)

     

    13        Senate              Judith Warnick (R)

    House 1           Tom Dent (R)

    House 2           Matt Manweller (R)

     

    14        House 1           Norm Johnson (R)

    House 2           Gina McCabe (R)

     

    15        Senate              Jim Honeyford (R)

    House 1           Bruce Chandler (R)

    House 2           David Taylor (R)

     

    16        House 1           Maureen Walsh (R)

    House 2           Terry Nealey (R)

     

    17        House 1           Lynda Wilson (R)

    House 2           Paul Harris (R)

    18        House 1           Brandon Vick (R)

    House 2           Liz Pike (R)

     

    19        House 1           Dean Takko (D)

    House 2           Brian Blake (D)

     

    20        House 1           Richard DeBolt (R)

    House 2           Ed Orcutt (R)

     

    21        Senate              Dan Matthews (R)

    House 1           Allen McPheeters (R)

    House 2           Jeff Scherrer (R)

     

    22        House 1           Steve Owens (R)

    House 2           No recommendation

     

    23        House 1           Scott Henden (R)

    House 2           James Olsen (R)

     

    24        House 1           Kevin Van De Wege (D)

    House 2           Thomas Greisamer (R)

     

    25        House 1           Melanie Stambough (R)

    House 2           Hans Zeiger (R)

     

    26        Senate              Jan Angel (R)

    House 1           Jesse Young (R)

    House 2           Michelle Caldier (R)

     

    27        House 1           Rodger Deskins (R)

    House 2           Steven Cook (R)

     

    28        Senate              Steve O’Ban (R)

    House 1           Dick Muri (R)

    House 2           Paul Wagemann (R)

     

    29        Senate              Steve Conway (D)

    House 1           Jason Bergstrom (R)

    House 2           Steve Kirby (D)

     

    30        Senate              Mark Miloscia (R)

    House 1           Linda Kochmar (R)

    House 2           Jack Dovey (R)

     

    31        Senate              Pam Roach (R)

    House 1           Drew Stokesbury (R)

    House 2           Chris Hurst (D) or

    Phil Fortunato (R)

     

    32        Senate              Robert Reedy (R)

    House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           Alvin Rutledge (R)

     

    33        Senate              Martin Metz (R)

    House 1           Michael Siefkes (R)

    House 2           Jeannette Burrage (R)

     

    34        Senate              No recommendation

    House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           No recommendation

     

    35        Senate              Tim Sheldon (D)

    House 1           Kathy Haigh (D)

    House 2           Drew MacEwen (R)

     

    36        Senate              Sarina Forbes (R)

    House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           Paul Addis (L)

     

    37        Senate              No recommendation

    House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           No recommendation

     

    38        Senate              Craig French (R)

    House 1           Jesse Anderson (R)

    House 2           Elijah Olson (L)

     

    39        House 1           Dan Kristiansen (R)

    House 2           Elizabeth Scott (R)

     

    40        House 1           Daniel Miller (R)

    House 2           No recommendation

     

    41        House 1           Bill Stinson (R)

    House 2           No recommendation

     

    42        Senate              Doug Ericksen (R)

    House 1           Luann VanWerven (R)

    House 2           Vincent Buys (R)

     

    43        Senate              No recommendation

    House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           No recommendation

     

    44        Senate              Steve Hobbs (D)

    House 1           Rob Toyer (R)

    House 2           Mark Harmsworth (R)

     

    45        Senate              Andy Hill (R)

    House 1           Joel Hussey (R)

    House 2           Brendan Woodward (R)

     

    46        Senate              Van Sperry (R)

    House 1           No recommendation

    House 2           Branden Curtis (R)

     

    47        Senate              Joe Fain (R)

    House 1           Mark Hargrove (R)

    House 2           Pat Sullivan (D)

     

    48        Senate              Michelle Darnell (R)

    House 1           Bill Hirt (R)

    House 2           Tim Turner (L)

     

    49        House 1           Anson Service (R)

    House 2           Lisa Ross (R)

     

     

     


    I-594 background checks: another gun control panacea that in reality is nothing more than a feel-good placebo.